Publishing ethics of the journal

Scientific-methodical electronic journal “journal of experimental education” follows:
1)international standards for editors and authors developed at the 2nd world conference on integrity of scientific research (2nd World Conference on Research Integrity, held in Singapore, 22-24 July 2010)
2) code of ethics of scientific publications, developed and approved by the Committee on publication ethics http://publicet.org/code:
The principles of professional ethics in the work of the editor and publisher:
— When deciding on publishing editor of the scientific journal is guided by valid data and scientific importance of the proposed work.
— An editor should evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, social status, or political philosophy of the authors.
— Unpublished data from a submitted manuscript must not be used for personal purposes or passed to third parties without the written consent of the author. Information or ideas obtained through peer review with possible benefits must be kept confidential and not used for the purpose of personal gain.
— The editor should not allow information to be published, if there are reasons to believe that it is plagiarism.
Editor in conjunction with the publisher should not leave unanswered complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper, as well as the detection of a conflict situation to take all necessary measures to restore the violated rights.
Ethical principles in the activities of the reviewer:
— Manuscript received for review must be treated as a confidential document that cannot be passed for examination or discussion with third parties, does not have any permission from the editor.
— The reviewer should be objective and reasoned evaluation of the results of the study. Personal criticism of the author is unacceptable.
— Unpublished data from a submitted manuscript must not be used by the reviewer for personal purposes.
A reviewer who has not, in his opinion, qualified to assess the manuscript, or may not be objective, for example, in the case of a conflict of interest with the author or organization must inform the editor with a request to be excluded from the reviewing process of this manuscript.
The principles that should guide the author of scientific publications:
— The authors should present an accurate account of the results of the studies. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements are unacceptable.
— Authors should ensure that the results of research that they have written entirely original works. The borrowed fragments or statements must be furnished with the obligatory indication of the author and the source. Excessive borrowing and plagiarism in any form, including unregistered quotes, paraphrasing or assignment of the results of other studies, unethical and unacceptable.
— It is necessary to recognize the contribution of all persons, one way or another influenced the course of the study, in particular, the article should contain links to works that have had importance to the study.
— Authors should not submit the manuscript that was submitted to another journal or under consideration, as well as the article is already published in another journal.
Co — authors of an article should be given all those who have made a significant contribution to the study. Among the co-authors should be all those persons who have not participated in the study.
— If an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in the article at the stage of submission or after its publication, he should notify the editor of the magazine.
3) the provisions of Chapter 70 of the Civil code of the Russian Federation.

Поделиться в соц. сетях

Share to Google Buzz
Share to Google Plus
Share to LiveJournal
Share to MyWorld
Share to Odnoklassniki
Share to Yandex